Popular marijuana myths are busted by a team of trained professionals.
Popular marijuana myths are busted by a team of trained professionals.
The first time I heard that the Declaration of Independence was written on hemp paper I had only one thought on my mind. How am I going to smoke the Declaration of Independence?Â If Method Man and Red Man saw Benjamin Franklin’s ghost when they smoked weed that was grown from Benjamin Franklin’s ashes, imagine the things you would see if you smoked a Declaration joint.
Needless to say, I have learned many things since I first heard this myth. First off, which many of you are likely to know, is the fact that hemp does not get you high. It contains so little THC that you would need to smoke just about as much hemp to get high as you would need to smoke marijuana to die. Even Michael Phelps withÂ hisÂ lung capacity couldn’t pull it off.
So, upon finding this out my dreams of getting high off the Declaration of Independence were shattered. I must have been a freshmen or sophomore in high school, so don’t worry I still had plenty to live for, and I started to investigate. I became interested in the wonders of hemp, and to this day can rattle off various facts about hemp that I learned nearly a decade ago. For example, the guy on the 1 dollar bill, the guy on the 2 dollar bill, the guy on the 10 dollar bill, and the guy on the 100 dollar bill all grew hemp. So, that’s Washington, Jefferson, Hamilton, and Benjamin aka Benjy Franklin. Also, the guys on the 5 and 20 are known to have smoked marijuana, that’s Lincoln and Jackson. It is also believed that Betsy Ross sewed the first American flag from hemp fibers. But, back to Benjy.
The guy grew hemp, owned a mill that turned hemp into paper, and wrote the Declaration of Independence on paper. It seems very likely that the Declaration of Independence was written on hemp paper. And, the first draft and many subsequent drafts of it were in fact written on hemp paper. But, the Declaration on display at the National Archives, the final copy, was written on parchment (made from animal skin).
So, is “THE” Declaration of Independence written on hemp, no it is not. But, the Declaration of Independence was written on hemp paper, without hemp paper who knows how different it would be today. So saying the Declaration is written on hemp paper is just like saying Benjamin Franklin wrote the Declaration of Independence, even though the final copy was actually written on parchment by Timothy Matlack, who was Franklin’s assistant. So, depending on how technical you get, you could argue either way that Benjamin Franklin did or did not write the Declaration just as it was or was not written on hemp paper.
Sorry if we shattered anyone’s dreams, just thought we’d get the truth out there. The most important thing to take away from this is that anyone who agrees that Benjamin FranklinÂ wroteÂ the Declaration must also agree that it was written on hemp paper. Only an uptight history buff would argue that technically it was Timothy Matlack who wrote it on parchment.
So, awhile ago we set up a poll asking our readers if they thought that they get more high when they cough while smoking makes. It seems like 78% of us feel that coughing gets us more high, while 17% say it doesn’t, and 5% apparently have never coughed while smoking. Now, here are some things to consider which might justify some truth behind this marijuana myth.
When you smoke marijuana, the main ingredient which gets you high is the chemical THC. Good old Delta 9 Tetrahydrocannabinol. When the THC reachesÂ approximatelyÂ 301 degrees Fahrenheit it becomes active (CBD at 403 F and CBN at 415 F). This is the reaction that occurs when you light a joint or a blunt, torch a bong, or use a vaporizer. In a joint, for example, the paper burns at 451 degrees Fahrenheit which is a major them in the book Fahrenheit 451. Or in the case of a bong or a bowl where you are using a butane lighter which burns around 550 degrees Fahrenheit. So, depending on the person and the size of theÂ apparatusÂ you are smoking out of, everyone will take in a different amount of smoke on any given toke of the sacred herb.
When you cough, your lungs are gasping for air, its an instinct which has stuck with us from our time as reptiles millions of years ago. When you cough, your lungs expand, and certain areas of your lung are exposed to smoke that wouldn’t have been had you not coughed.
So, you might not get as high taking a hit from a joint that makes you cough as you would from a hit from a bong. But, the best way to utilize any given hit is to maximize the amount THC that you absorb. This can be easily achieved by coughing and increasing the surface area in your lungs that can absorb the THC, or by holding in the hit. We have also been looking in to what the ideal amount of time is to hold in a hit. Let us know what youÂ thinkÂ it is, by voting in this poll.
And, to vote in the coughing poll, click here.
So, we we’re asked “Can one simple cannon(ball) sink a pirate ship?” Now, this is a very intriguing question in our opinion. It doesn’t have anything to do with marijuana. It really isn’t even a myth. But, we suspect that whoever asked this question was undoubtedly under the influence of God’s blessed herb.
So, where to begin. We don’t own a cannon, and that is probably for the best. And, if we had a pirate ship. It is much more likely we would be shooting cannons at other ships than our own, just saying. But, it is important to remember that this is the 21st century. A time in which we still have pirates and where practically everything has been figured out, except maybe the speed of dark and who really built the pyramids.
Fortunately, someone has figured out if cannonballs could sink wooden ships. And this great-wizard-of-the-ancient-world’s name isÂ Yaacov Kahanov, a professor at the University of Haifa in Israel. He found that cannon fire could penetrate wooden hulled ships, and that slower moving cannonballs actually did more damage to a ship’s hull than a faster moving cannon ball.
Let’s assume a cannon was fired. Before hitting its target it dipped into the water, and the impact with the water slowed the cannonball down slightly. Then, it made impact with the wooden hull of its target while under water. It seems very likely that one sole cannonball could in fact sink a ship.
For more information on this subject we recommend this article, here.
Thank you for submitting your myth. Remember, we will even bust myths that don’t pertain to marijuana, as long as you thought of them while you were high. So, stay high. And, to submit your myths, click here.
The Powers That Be would have us believe that marijuana can hurt our health and ruinâ€”or evenÂ endâ€”our lives. Cannabis is portrayed as a â€śgateway drugâ€ť (that leads on to â€śharder,â€ť more harmful substances), with no medical value, that only full prohibition can save us from. The problem is that serious scholarly studies (many of which wereÂ fundedÂ by the government) and published reports refuteÂ allÂ this. We looked at 10 studies the government would rather we never read.
Say What?Â Prohibition doesnâ€™t work.
Says Who?Â The National Research Council of the National Academies (NRC).
So What?Â The NRCâ€™s 2001 report,Â Informing Americaâ€™s Policy on Illegal Drugs:
What We Donâ€™t Know Keeps Hurting Us, concluded that data was simply lacking to show the effectiveness of government drug policyâ€”and particularly drug law enforcement. Using what information was available at the time, this substantial report (which was requested by the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy in 1998) noted that there is â€ślittle apparent relationship between severity of sanctions prescribed for drug use and prevalence or frequency of use.â€ť
Say What?Â Marijuana is safer than booze and tobacco.
Says Who?Â The World Health Organizationâ€”and Americans!
So What?Â Having studied the comparative health and societal consequences of marijuana use compared to other drugs, including alcohol and nicotine, in the mid-1990s, World Health Organization experts concluded: â€śCannabis poses a much less serious public health problem than is currently posed by alcohol and tobacco in Western societies.â€ť Americans appear to agree. In a 2009 Rasmussen Reports telephone survey, 51 percent of respondents said alcohol is more dangerous than marijuana (and just 19 percent said pot is worse).
Say What?Â Marijuana is aÂ terminus, not a gateway.
Says Who?Â French researchers.
So What?Â Far from leading to the use of other illicit substances, research by scientists in Paris suggests that pot might actuallyÂ reduceÂ the urge to try â€śhardâ€ť drugs. The findings of ValĂ©rie DaugĂ© and her team at the Laboratory for Physiopathology of Diseases of the Central Nervous System, published in the journalÂ NeuropsychopharmacologyÂ in 2009, concluded that the administration of oral THC to rats can suppress their sensitivity to opiate dependence.
Say What?Â Marijuana has medical value.
Says Who?Â The Institute of Medicine (ION).
So What?Â The IOMâ€™s 1999, White House-commissioned review of available data on the herbâ€™s medical risks and benefits found marijuana to be â€śmoderately well suited for particular conditions, such as chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and AIDS wasting.â€ť Apparently these findings were not quite what the feds were hoping for. Co-author John A. Benson told theÂ New York TimesÂ in 2006 that â€ś[The federal government] loves to ignore our report.â€ť
Say What?Â Cannabis wonâ€™t ruin your life!
Says Who?Â The Department of Veterans Affairs.
So What?Â In 1997,Â Veterans Affairs scientists published the findings of their study of 56 pairs of identical twins, one of which had been a heavy marijuana user, while the second had barely touched the stuff. â€śNo significant differences were found between the former marijuana user twins and their siblings for current socio-demographic characteristics, current nicotine or alcohol use; life-time nicotine or alcohol abuse/dependence, past 5-year out-patient or emergency room visits, hospitalizations or medication use for medical problems; past 5-year mental health out-patient use or hospitalizations; or health-related quality of life,â€ť their report found.Â So there!
Say What?Â Marijuana can lower risks of certain cancers.
Says Who?Â Brown University.
So What?Â A 2009 study by investigators at Brown University on Rhode Island (along with researchers at the University of Minnesota, Louisiana State University and Boston University) reported that moderate long-term marijuana users are around 62 percent less likely to develop head and neck cancers (compared with non-marijuana smokers). Their report, which was published in the journalÂ Cancer Prevention Research, stated that â€śmarijuana use modified the interaction between alcohol and cigarette smoking, resulting in a decreased [cancer] risk.â€ť
Say What?Â Smoking cannabis doesÂ notÂ induce mental illness.
Says Who?Â Britainâ€™s Keele University Medical School.
So What?Â Both the media and some governments have long linked smoking marijuana with mental illness. Yet a report by Keele University Medical School, based on incidences of schizophrenia and trends in cannabis use in the U.K. from 1996 to 2005, suggested there was in fact no correlation between the two. Though cannabis use was rising in that country during that period, the Keele researchers reported that â€śthe incidence and prevalence of schizophrenia and psychoses were either stable or decliningâ€ť and that â€śthis study does not therefore support the specific causal link between cannabis use and incidence of psychotic disorders.â€ť
Say What?Â Government anti-pot ads can backfire.
Says Who?Â The Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania.
So What?Â In 2009, investigators at the Annenberg School for Communication posted the results of their assessment of the attitudes of over 600 adolescents after viewing 60 fed-funded, anti-pot TV spots. In particular, they evaluated responses to marijuana-related imagery (like the depiction of people smoking pot) in these public service announcements. Scenes like these were â€śsignificantly less effective than others,â€ť said the study. â€śFor [high-risk] adolescents, including marijuana scenes â€¦ may not be a good strategy.â€ť
Say What?Â Marijuana may protect, not harm, the brain.
Says Who?Â Investigators at the University of California San Diego.
So What?Â UC San Diego researchers used high-tech scans to compare microscopic changes in the brainâ€™s white matter in adolescents with histories of binge boozing and cannabis use. Sure enough, binge drinkers showed signs of white matter damage in eight regions of the brain. But those who also used pot experienced less damage in seven out of these eight regions. Their findings, published in the journalÂ Neurotoxicology and TeratologyÂ in 2009, included the possibility â€śthat marijuana may have some neuroprotective properties in mitigating alcohol-related oxidative stress or excitotoxic cell death.â€ť
Say What?Â Marijuana wonâ€™t kill you!
Says Who?Â The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA).
So What?Â As long ago as 1997, a huge study of California HMO members sponsored by NIDA (and published in theÂ American Journal of Public Health) concluded that marijuana use causes no significant increase in mortality. Oh, and that tobacco use is associated with increased risk of death (duh!).
Article fromÂ http://freeculturemag.com/